The truth is out and our eyes are pried opened. Focusing on the very serious subject of guns, Michael Moore is able to put a humorous spin on his documentary type of film, “Bowling for Columbine”. He explores Americans views on gun laws and whether the ordinary citizen should be able to easily attain firearms and ammunition. It soon becomes obvious that although he is a bias film maker, Moore is not afraid to get out and do the dirty work of a thriving journalist. Short capturing clips give the viewers a dynamic view on guns. While using various techniques this film contains something for everyone. Contrasting his views on Americans and Canadians, he discovers that Canadians feel a lot safer in their communities than Americans. Hence they don’t feel the need to carry guns for protection like many of the Americans admit they did. Also based mostly in Colorado, Moore couldn’t miss the opportunity to include the infamous Columbine school shooting in his favour. Nearing the end Moore also gets together with two boys who have Kmart bullets imbedded into their bodies from the school shooting. Using the boys scarring he tries to convince Kmart to stop selling ammunition.
Although most of the subjects he addresses are true, there were some aspects that seemed fictional. Moore crosses the border to interview multiple Canadians and he questions them about how safe they feel in their neighbourhood. He discovered that multiple people don't even feel the need to lock their doors. In the film there were clips of him opening random doors, and every single one opened. Thats not very realistic because there were probably multiple doors that didn't open which he didn't include in the film. But something Moore points are that make people start to wonder is that if Canadians also have millions of guns in Canada why are there still less shootings there compared to America? Canada is known to be a lot more peaceful than America and Moore wants explore the idea of why. He indicates that in the mean time Americans should start following the Canadians lead.
We have all heard of the devastating school shooting at Columbine. One day two male students decide to go into their school armed and shoot down the staff and students. Killing 12 students and one teacher they finish the massacre by taking their own lives. Interviewing the people closely associated with the two young men it still remains a mystery on why they committed such a horrible crime. But it was also very concerning how easily the two boys were able to buy fire arms and ammunition in America. Moore presses that it should be a lot harder so that something like that never happened again. Unfortunately it is noticeable that the trend is only growing. One would think that young innocent kids being murdered would be enough for the government to make these gun laws a lot stricter.
Continuing with the school shooting, Moore meets two young boys who were shot at Columbine that day. They are forced to live their life everyday with those haunting bullets firmly embedded into their skin. The two who were shooting bought the bullets from Kmart. To try and make a change Moore travels to Kmart headquarters with the two boys. He wanted to talk with someone to stop Kmart from selling the types of bullets inside the students. At first he struggled to get anyones cooperation, but when he showed up with the media that all changed. Moore used to the two boys as models to almost guilt the workers of Kmart. At last Kmart agreed to immediately stop selling ammunition.
Moore makes a very good point about how the gun laws are not strict enough in America. Maybe if ordinary citizens weren't able to obtain guns so easily, they wouldn't need their own guns to protect themselves from others with similar guns. Moore did a good job on deceiving the audience and pointing his fingers at Charlton Heston, the president of the NRA. Soon after the Columbine shooting the NRA, National Rifle Association, held their annual event in Colorado. The speeches shown in the film were portrayed to seem as if Heston was being very insensitive about the shootings, really the speeches were very unrelated. Also not mentioned in the film was the fact that Heston couldn't move the event so quickly by law. Although some clips are twisted to go in Moore’s favour, he still brings light to a growing matter in American society.